> Before he started, users visiting http://hyperdev.com http://hyperdev.com (Glitch’s predecessor) went straight to the editor. An app was spun up automatically

> Before he started, users visiting http://hyperdev.com http://hyperdev.com (Glitch’s predecessor) went straight to the editor. An app was spun up automatically. > All those users and apps were counted in usage figures for as long as I was there (and maybe still?) Of the millions of apps that Glitch tauts, I’d guess a significant percentage are either barely changed from the default or do nothing but return a 500. I've always wondered could this sort of behavior be considered fraud? Kind of like how I think some platforms allow bots to boost usage statistics, etc. And, if the company doesn't work out, can the investors sue for that reason?