3 ms·
That isn't the employee's money by definition - when it was sold as equity it became the shareholders. Just giving it away would be embezzlement just as much as
by Nasrudith 6y ago
That isn't the employee's money by definition - when it was sold as equity it became the shareholders. Just giving it away would be embezzlement just as much as if the CEO decided to have it resting in their account. Thus there needs some sort of purpose for the spending. Without any sort of equity based compensation the relationship with employees is inherently transactional - only getting more money if they think there is some sort of return from it be it reduced turnover, better performance, or as a way to attract new talent.
If you want employees to gain in that situation you need a worker owned coop, there is nothing making such a thing illegal although historically it usually hasn't scaled as well for several reasons and the inaccessibility of the equity to employees and lack of guarantees means the default assessment for that value in new ventures is $0 to the employee.
- evancox100 6y agoI was going to go into the idea of employee-owned co-ops as a possible solution, but my post got too long. I think this is on the right track. It doesn’t have to be a binary choice between either 100% investor-owned or 100% employee-owned. You could have a for-profit corporation with profit-sharing, where employees are entitled to maybe 25% of the profits, etc.