3 ms·
Analysis of all available papers as of Apr 20: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit https://docs.google.com/docu
by jakeogh 6y ago
Analysis of all available papers as of Apr 20: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq...
- xenophonf 6y agoWritten by who? Reviewed by who else for correctness and (just as importantly) completeness? Paid for by who, with what potential conflicts of interest? For something purporting to be the current consensus of evidence-based medicine, it sure lacks the usual hallmarks of scientific inquiry: openness, transparency, review. Edited to add: Plus, that anonymous Google doc doesn't even represent the latest research, because the Raoult paper (under the heading "12 April 2020") has already been retracted: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/05/21/french-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19-study-withdrawn/ https://retractionwatch.com/2020/05/21/french-hydroxychloroq...