3 ms·

This article appears to be from 2017. There isn't any new information on the nodosaur specimen.

• alecb 6y ago
  Yah, it's also a clumsy plagiarization of our article: https://allthatsinteresting.com/nodosaur-dinosaur-mummy https://allthatsinteresting.com/nodosaur-dinosaur-mummy It looks like their site is another on the list that lifts our articles and recirculates them on social media.
  • eloff 6y ago
    @dang can we change the link to this one to give credit to the source? And add 2017 tag.
    • gus_massa 6y ago
      You will get a faster response if you send an email to hn@ycombinator.com They usually respond very fast.
    • dang 6y ago
      We've changed from https://www.earthlymission.com/dinosaur-mummy-science-discovery-nodosaur-intact-canada/ https://www.earthlymission.com/dinosaur-mummy-science-discov... to the original source.
  • tthayer 6y ago
    Which is itself a summary of the original NG article? https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/dinosaur-nodosaur-fossil-discovery/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/dinosaur...
  • ComputerGuru 6y ago
    Yours is just a regurgitation of the National Geographic feature, so I’m not sure what legs you have to stand on here. Ironic.