> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/translate#Verb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/translate#Verb lists three senses of "translate" And so do "execute" and "interp

> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/translate#Verb https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/translate#Verb lists three senses of "translate" And so do "execute" and "interpret". The fact that you are counting the second set of meanings of translate, which is archaic (who said "words have meaning, not what some related word might have meant in the past"?), shows that you know how weak your argument is. > That is why we introduce technical terms to speak of technical things. Yep. I introduced two technical terms "outer interpreter" and "inner interpreter", along with their definitions. > I don't know what you are trying to tell me. Which is a fitting end to this discussion about your insistence on communicating less clearly than you might. Being able to accept that others may have a different terminology, embrace it and speak with their words: this is communication. You don't have a monopoly on the meaning of words.