3 ms·
What do you expect for those results though? I think a better example is searching "+= operator python", for which it successfully highlights the "+=" and find
by TechBro8615 6y ago
What do you expect for those results though?
I think a better example is searching "+= operator python", for which it successfully highlights the "+=" and finds relevant results:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%2B%3D%22+operator+python&oq=%22%2B%3D%22+operator+python&aqs=chrome..69i57.3531j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%2B%3D%22+operator+python...
- techbio 6y agoYou get arguably better results (though mostly the same) if you leave out the '+=': https://www.google.com/search?q=operator+python https://www.google.com/search?q=operator+python Edit: Let me walk that back a little. The highlighting may be helpful in some cases and it follows that the operator search is better than I'd noticed in the past. Still an indexing and security nightmare to have loose user-def'd punctuation running over data. Go Big-G, doing what's hard.