4 ms·
If my choice is between not being able to enter the US and having US authorities go through my personal devices, I will choose non-entry. That part doesn't worr
by cluenerf 6y ago
If my choice is between not being able to enter the US and having US authorities go through my personal devices, I will choose non-entry. That part doesn't worry me so much.
What does worry me is that at the border I have no rights. The usual protections enjoyed by people inside the US don't apply to me. My privacy and dignity at the behest of the whims of whichever border guard I might encounter, and I have zero legal recourse if my rights are violated.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- yardie 6y agoThis is not exclusive to the US. Every country's border works similar. They can do enhanced interrogation without probably cause, without a lawyer. You're right to refuse is still intact but your request to gain entry will almost certainly be denied.
- sneak 6y agoBe careful, "enhanced interrogation" denotes actual torture, such as waterboarding.
- yardie 6y agoYou are right. I've changed my reply to enhanced questioning. It's a shame that GWB, Condi Rice, Cheney, Tenet, Ashcroft, and Rumsfeld are walking around, on TV, and sitting on boards and none have faced consequences.