3 ms·
‘Reply-guy‘ is subjective, and a bit reductionist and has a somewhat negative connotation. It’s used to describe unwanted attention from a specific person or a
by aspenmayer 6y ago
‘Reply-guy‘ is subjective, and a bit reductionist and has a somewhat negative connotation. It’s used to describe unwanted attention from a specific person or a specific type of person, which is also subjective. It goes further than simply replying a lot and generally being active on Twitter. Not to be a lexical prescriptivist, just aiming for clarity of description of usage and NPOV.
https://twitter.com/sbarolo/status/1036685010869407744?s=20 https://twitter.com/sbarolo/status/1036685010869407744?s=20
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_vie...
- bransonf 6y agoAppreciate it. I've just been hearing the term thrown around a lot lately in context of someone who replies to every single one of someone else's tweets.
- aspenmayer 6y agoI would say that’s proper usage based on context.