> Rugged individualism for all, except the wealthy elite. This is a direct consequence of considering money to be free speech: those who have more of it have l

> Rugged individualism for all, except the wealthy elite. This is a direct consequence of considering money to be free speech: those who have more of it have louder voices, and this matters a lot when it comes to elections, and when it's time for politicians to pay back their debts to the donors.