3 ms·

Incorrect. They both have their strengths and weaknesses: https://medium.com/@leventov/comparison-of-the-open-source-olap-systems-for-big-data-clickhouse-druid

Incorrect. They both have their strengths and weaknesses: https://medium.com/@leventov/comparison-of-the-open-source-olap-systems-for-big-data-clickhouse-druid-and-pinot-8e042a5ed1c7 https://medium.com/@leventov/comparison-of-the-open-source-o...

rb808 6y ago
> ClickHouse is simpler and has less moving parts and services. sounds good to me
- pachico 6y ago
  I've been using ClickHouse in production to do things I just couldn't do with any other technology, it's not only simpler.
- gilbetron 6y ago
  Having administered Druid for several years, ClickHouse's supposed simplicity is definitely appealing were I to start a new project with similar requirements. Then again, back then, I needed Petabyte scale and > 1 million inserts/sec and ClickHouse couldn't do it.
  - pachico 6y ago
    I managed to do 5m/s in a single server. Something must be off.
    - gilbetron 6y ago
      Depends on how big your structs are coming in, how you are holding on to the data, and what else you are doing with it on ingestion.