3 ms·
Because it's hard to drive change if there isn't a "need". Going into the office is the status quo, and there wasn't any real pressing drive to change/innovate
by sb52191 6y ago
Because it's hard to drive change if there isn't a "need". Going into the office is the status quo, and there wasn't any real pressing drive to change/innovate there.
Now that companies have been forced to go remote, I think they're seeing some benefits from it, and there's a lot less inertia to fight against.
- kthxbye123 6y agoYes, my point is that this is the same mechanism that will reduce the inertia for "move half of our engineers to low-wage countries and squeeze the wages of the ones that are left"