2 ms·
Setting aside the few religious exceptions, that is correct. This gets to the root of the issue. Whether the body is property of the family or of the state. I a
by ghastmaster 6y ago
Setting aside the few religious exceptions, that is correct. This gets to the root of the issue. Whether the body is property of the family or of the state. I argue for the former. In the USA there has to be compensation for property taken by the state. There also has to be a public good argument in most jurisdictions as far as I know. Because the beneficiary of the organ is not the general public, but an individual, I do not see how this could work without massive revisions to state and federal law.
- ceejayoz 6y agoAs far as I can tell, dead bodies aren't property in the US. They can't be stolen (although other laws would likely apply), they aren't part of the deceased's estate, etc. http://thelegalgeeks.com/2014/11/13/stealing-corpses-and-obstruction-of-justice/ http://thelegalgeeks.com/2014/11/13/stealing-corpses-and-obs...
- bborud 6y agoAaaand suddenly the discussion took the un-charming turn where suddenly deceased human beings are possibly property.