4 ms·
I applaud your efforts, and am happy to see more options available. I really hope this takes off. Your choice to not include systemd is a HUGE incentive for m
by UI_at_80x24 6y ago
I applaud your efforts, and am happy to see more options available. I really hope this takes off. Your choice to not include systemd is a HUGE incentive for me to try this out.
1 super-small nit to pick: the sub-title "..a focus on less is more.."
I took that way too literally and thought it was referencing the tool `less` and was expecting it to have used less as a wrapper for everything. (call it a brain fart, and lack of caffeine)
I FUCKING LOVE YOUR WEB PAGE.
Thank-you so fucking much for reminding people and showing that simple is beautiful. Everything is clear, obvious and legible.
- _n_b_ 6y agoOn most systems these days, 'less' is more: % cksum `which less` `which more` 2677110273 146976 /usr/bin/less 2677110273 146976 /usr/bin/more
- snazz 6y agoI think that more is symlinked to less on your system, not the other way around. On my machine (Arch), they're separate: jack@jackdesktop ~ [1]> bash -c "cksum `which less` `which more`" 3407085100 179664 /usr/bin/less 110370394 38816 /usr/bin/more jack@jackdesktop ~>
- _n_b_ 6y agoOK, now you've prompted me to do proper research: Not a symlink (or even a hard link) on my OS X laptop, but the same executable. On my OpenBSD systems, they're hard links. On my Ubuntu system, they're separate.
- snazz 6y agoInteresting! I wonder what the historical reason is for all of those different permutations.