13 ms·

Why I'm Close to Giving Up on Windows Phone 7, as a User and a Developer

131 points by ct 16y ago

dr_ 16y ago
This is just another example of Microsoft not having their act together. I mean, forget Windows Phone 7, but Vista was just a disaster. The company nearly sacrificed it's main revenue source. Apple isn't exactly known for being transparent on matters either, but you can imagine if something goes wrong there what the internal pressure must be to get it fixed ASAP. Because soon enough they do fix it. As Steve Jobs himself said, "great artists ship" I still really feel Microsoft can get back on track if they had new executive level management. Someone younger, bolder, a little audacious but with the ability to execute - like for example bringing back Gundotra at the CEO level. It's just that they need to do it sooner rather than later.
makecheck 16y ago
Microsoft's an interesting beast. Things that "should" matter to them, like Windows, somehow reach the point of almost falling apart (see Windows Me or Vista). Then, groups that are practically losing money build great things like the Xbox 360 and Kinect. Some products that stumble end up dead, like the Zune, while others are dragged back up to par (see IE9 and Windows 7). This current mess could mean anything from "WP7 is doomed, sell your stock" to "the Eye of Sauron just hasn't shone on that product group yet". We'll see. Personally, I'm thinking WP7 will pull a Vista or two and then become a cool phone OS, but the competition isn't standing still either. When Apple was launching the iPhone, they pulled engineers from their flagship Mac OS X to work on new phone software. They seemed to think it was pretty important to launch with a strong product and have all the details right; to them, even delaying a product from another part of their business was an acceptable risk. When was the last time Microsoft did anything like that? Instead of slapping together product groups to shove their way into every has-been market, they could stand to divert some developers, developers, developers to products that need a polished launch, such as WP7.
- iamdave 16y ago
  That's the thing I never understood about Microsoft. When they really focus, and spend more time on producing a product versus marketing a product, the seem to do some great things (SEE: Windows 2000/NT). It seems like MS could really use from some user centric project managers or something to really get them on the course to consistent delivery, because that's what's lacking. Vista was a bust, 7 was a phenom by MS standards. The 360 did OK, the Kinect was brilliant. By the logic that is the Windows development cycle, Windows 8 is going to be an abysmal failure. I'm an OS X user now, but I'll still say how great Win7 is, and the only thing I wish to see come from the company is some form in consistency with their products and marketing. These "To the cloud" commercials NEED to stop.
  - TomOfTTB 16y ago
    Without making a judgment one way or the other in regards to the people at Microsoft I'd make one point about what you said. The problem with looking at Microsoft through the lens of Windows NT to Windows 7 is that Microsoft consists of completely different people in those two eras. The people who spearheaded windows in the time of Windows NT and Windows 2000 were worth tens of millions of dollars by the time Vista went out to door. So most had long moved on to personal ventures.
    - iamdave 16y ago
      You have a very valid point, however I'm not per se making the argument of a dichotomy between Windows NT and Windows 7. I am however saying that Microsoft CAN, when they narrow down build some great products. And it seems like every time, as soon as they do, they trip up on their own two feet and fall face first on the very next one.
- kenjackson 16y ago
  Windows ME was a result of MS moving their top talent to the NT group. ME should have never been released, but Win2K wasn't ready to be the consumer OS. When you don't have the company riding on you, you can take bigger risks. It will be interesting to see what Windows 8 ends up becoming. Vista was largely a failure because they were overly ambitious, despite common belief. I fear that this failure will prevent Windows from being ambitious again. I hope they learned that they failed for very specific reasons -- not just ambition in of itself.
Legion 16y ago
tl;dr: Guy keeps buying shitty MS mobile products, MS dutifully keeps making shitty mobile products. Very reminiscent of Apple fans in the '90s, buying crap products because they've defined themselves to be on Team Apple.
- kenjackson 16y ago
  That's possibly the worst most inaccurate tldr I've seen. Did you read the article or just project what you'd like it to say. You do no one any favors by posting an inaccurate tldr.
  - bostonpete 16y ago
    tl;dr: Legion's tl;dr sucked.
- originalgeek 16y ago
  You forgot to mention the final part: after 10 years of getting screwed by Microsoft, the guy is still hopeful that they are going to get it right.
- lukifer 16y ago
  To be fair: in the 90's, at least Mac fans had the excuse of not wanting to give up existing hardware/software peripherals. That's not really applicable to MS mobiles.
  - dasil003 16y ago
    Not to mention the fact that Apple actually needed the rabid fanbase. Every single person could instantly hate Microsoft and they wouldn't be going anywhere for a long long long time.
jdub 16y ago
TL;DR: A very long cover letter for the guy's job application to the Microsoft Windows Phone team.
- potatolicious 16y ago
  And power to him - if only everyone on the WP7 team cared this much. IMO these certainly aren't the words of someone just trolling for a job.
- shaggyfrog 16y ago
  Job application? Does anyone willingly sign up for a death march or to preside over the funeral of a dead-end project if they can avoid it?
TomOfTTB 16y ago
I think this attitude has been the downfall of a lot of developers over the years. You fall in love with the development environment and then you transfer that love to the platform itself. The problem is sometimes great platforms aren't paired with great products. Microsoft is at least two generations behind Google and Apple at this point. Some would argue three generations. I'm a .net developer who loves C# too so I'm sympathetic. But putting a lot of resources into Windows phone 7 at this point is just folly
- kenjackson 16y ago
  But putting a lot of resources into Windows phone 7 at this point is just folly It feels like MS isn't putting enough skin in the game. They shipped the OS in September. Great. That gets you a toe in the door. They should have rev'ed that OS at least as many times as Apple has theirs. Apple has shipped 5 updates to iOS since September. MS -- one (the update to prepare for future updates, so really not even a real update). That's embarrassing that the market leader, with 300k apps in the appstore and 100M devices on the market is more agile. And as a developer, you have to ask yourself, "Is this a platform I want to get in bed with?" At this point, I wouldn't.
  - masklinn 16y ago
    And to complete this, even if you compare W7P with the early iPhone OS (arguing that both are version ones, not that they're both living in 2011), the first 6 months Apple shipped 1 major updates, 3 bugfix updates and 1 compatibility update (for the 1st gen iPod Touch). And a second major update in month 7. 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 were all followed by 2 major and 2 bugfix updates in the first 6 months.
  - architectzero 16y ago
    Comparing WP7 to iOS doesn't really make sense in this case. WP7 is, like Android, an OS used by several manufacturers and delivered on several networks. Each manufacturer and carrier has their own acceptance testing scheme. Failure at any step means tweaking and retesting. It took Android from 2008-09-23 to 2009-04-30 to get to it's first MAJOR update (cupcake, v1.5). MS is pretty much on the same pace. (Note: Android 1.1 was exclusively for the T-Mobile G-1; I don't consider that comparable to the WP7 Nodo update.) iOS runs on iPhone and iPad, and on a comparably limited number of networks. Yet it took from 2007-06-29 until 2009-06-17 (days shy of 2 years) just to get copy and paste functionality. The market leader only looks more agile today, after they worked out a ton of bugs. Considering just how well WP7 worked from day one, I think it actually has a very bright future.
peteypao 16y ago
His Microsoft-centricity is pretty annoying.
swilliams 16y ago
The marketing for Windows Phone 7 was pretty extensive in the US. I don't watch much TV, but I definitely saw plenty of the "We need a phone to save us from our phones" ads. Was it really that much smaller in the UK? And have there really been NO bugfixes or patches (other than the notorious one he mentioned)? That's insane. Microsoft has got to know how far behind the ball they are... why aren't they pulling out all the stops on this? For Microsoft: This isn't Windows. You can't wait 3 years (or more) for every release.
- Strom 16y ago
  I've seen lots of those "We need a phone to save us from our phones" ads and I've never in my life seen an Android or an iPhone ad. So saying that Microsoft didn't advertise seems weird.
- astrodust 16y ago
  All I ever see is ads for "Cloud vs. Claude" and none of them make any sense. Microsoft cloud computing for editing photos? Huh?
- dagw 16y ago
  I don't know about the UK, but there has been zero windows Phone 7 advertising in Sweden. No TV, no billboards, no in store promotion, hell I haven't even a working WP7 demo phone in any electronics store. If you don't follow tech blogs there would be no way to know that WP7 was even out. Compare this to Android where there is plenty of promotion on all fronts and it looks like Microsoft doesn't really want to sell phones here.
alok-g 16y ago
Is it any better with Android? Here's a list of issues: -- Android resets your phone to factory settings without asking you or even giving a warning if you port a number to it. This deserves a class-action lawsuit. See here: http://androidforums.com/droid-x-support-troubleshooting/131476-hard-reset-when-porting-new-number-x.html http://androidforums.com/droid-x-support-troubleshooting/131... -- Using the built in email application, sent emails often stuck in the outbox. See here: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=6d4b97299085cebe&hl=en http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=6d4... -- Wifi on the phone does not work if SSID is hidden. See here: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1041 http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1041 -- Bluetooth on the device is unable to connect to a desktop to transfer files or sync. See here: http://www.bing.com/search?q=android+bluetooth+paired+but+not+connected http://www.bing.com/search?q=android+bluetooth+paired+but+no... -- Once you sign in into Google Account using any Google app (like Gmail), you cannot sign out, ever! Only way to "sign out" is to reset the phone to factory defaults, which means loosing all your data and needing phone activation again. See here: http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/12/27/how-to-remove-change-google-account-from-android/ http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/12/27/how-to-remove-change-g... -- They have artificially blocked use of Google Calendar app on the phone from functioning unless using a Google Account. Of course Google isn't interested in Outlook Sync, but even third-party developers suffer. Many have started providing their own calendar apps. See here: http://www.syncdroid.net/ http://www.syncdroid.net/ If you follow the links, you may notice that many of the issues have been open for a few years, some since Android version 1.6, etc. Google just does not care. To fix the issue with sent emails stuck in the outbox, people have started from the source code of the built-in email app and created K-9 mail, which is 10X more powerful, and works.
- joenathan 16y ago
  Actually you are wrong on a few of those points, for one, I use bluetooth to transfer files to my phone(2.1 device) all the time, but I have seen some android phones where that does work, it seems to be dependent on whether or not the manufacturer has lock that feature down or not. Also you can remove or unlink you google account in the "Accounts & Sync" area of the settings menu.
rodh257 16y ago
I wonder what this experience is like compared to early Android adopters? Was there similar issues, with bugs and then updates not coming for them?
- erikpukinskis 16y ago
  Android has some pretty wacky longstanding bugs, even now. My friend and I both have HTC Incredibles, and whenever I text him I come up as his friend Frank, with Frank's picture. I got a bunch of very confused texts from him before we figured that one out. Now whenever I text him, I have to append (This is Erik).
  - kenjackson 16y ago
    If you were dating a couple of girls, that could end up with some really embarrassing situations.
- Apocryphon 16y ago
  From the development side, the Android emulator is really wonky, which is annoying at times.
xentronium 16y ago
I am not in any position to give advice to Microsoft, but it seems to me that they are trying to apply the winning strategies they used in one game to all the others. Example: WP7. What is expected: They ship fast and they update fast and agile, they don't have giant compatibility legacy to maintain. What actually happens: WP7 took forever to ship and never got updated. My speculation why it happened: they've got some lengthy and fairly bureaucratic process of approving new features, new versions, etc. They apply the same methodic they used with windows to their WP7, like, always maintain backward compatibility, be very reliable (well, you all know what happened) and predictable. They're, like, four years late and they keep wasting time. Not to mention that WinMo wasn't too great either. I had an iPaq, which was sort of okay, but it didn't rock. It wasn't "cool" in any sense. And they probably vastly underestimate the coolness factor. My $0.02.
- mattmanser 16y ago
  I don't think that's their strategy generally. Their current development strategy for things like MVC and Silverlight is to pre-release new functionality as an unsupported project, full source and iterate fast. They're quite agile in areas. WP7 feels like some one has suddenly put the breaks on it.
  - smiler 16y ago
    It's one thing to ship MVC & Silverlight as unsupported projects and iterate fast, but quite another to iterate phone software quickly where you could potentially brick millions of phones with one small software update. As noted in this blog post, an update applied to the phone broke it and the user had to get a brand new phone. This added a customer service burden to the mobile provider / network - which in turn means they will moan to Microsoft when they do this and give them less enthuiasm for WP7 devices in future if it keeps happening.
jister 16y ago
Was the first release of iPhone or Android really that flawless compared to WM7?
- Apocryphon 16y ago
  WM7 is entering the game a lot later than those two OS's, so presumably they should have learned from their mistakes by now.
- rahoulb 16y ago
  I bought an original iPhone because a colleague said "there's an awful lot it doesn't do but what it does do is so good you won't miss the rest". I may be miremembering but I don't recall any real issues with it, and it still is the best phone I've owned.
- Andrex 16y ago
  WP7 was also the seventh version of WinMo, keep in mind.
stretchwithme 16y ago
Why are you only close to giving up? Is this windows phone thing a significant platform? http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/12/07/microsoft-doesnt-expect-windows-phone-7-sales-to-catch-up-to-ios-or-android-any-time-soon/ http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/12/07/microsoft-doesnt-expe... Mossberg asked: “So.. how long before you’re back into the market… back up to a good marketshare, up there with Android and Apple?” “I don’t know..” “Couple months?” “Longer than that.” “Couple years?” “Maybe.” Isn't it time to stop developing for OS/2?
- recoiledsnake 16y ago
  That sounds realistic for a nascent platform. Even a super awesome OS will take time to displace the incumbents. You're disappointed that you didn't get BS marketing speak that it would defeat Apple and Google in 2 weeks or what?
  - prr 16y ago
    > You're disappointed that you didn't get BS marketing speak that it would defeat Apple and Google in 2 weeks http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-windows-phone-7-rtm-with-funeral-parade-for/ http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-wind... I'll just leave that there ;)
    - recoiledsnake 16y ago
      Where's the marketing speak there? That seems to be an internal joke for the team after their hard work over 2 years for meeting the deadline of the 2010 holiday season and to "rally the troops".
yread 16y ago
I even started working on iPhone apps. I really hate Mac OSX, Objective-C, and XCode. But I had to go with the market. Stopped reading here.
- inflatablenerd 16y ago
  Why?
  - yread 16y ago
    I don't understand why a web developer would have to go and develop applications for mobile platform when (s)he doesn't enjoy it. If I had to work with in an OS that I hate, with developer tools that I hate in a programing language that I hate I would rather change jobs.
    - rick_bc 16y ago
      But it's not a job for him; it's his business.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
cemetric 16y ago
I'm always under the impression Microsoft is counting on luck when it comes to bringing out software. The kinect (or what's the name) is a big success, but is this because of the hardware or the software? I'm wondering too if Microsoft takes itself serious at times.
- redthrowaway 16y ago
  It's an interesting point. I think MS's courting of kinect hackers signifies that they haven't quite figured out what it's for yet. They know they're sitting on an awesome piece of hardware, and damned if they know what to make of it. Right now it's Wii++ and they know it could be so much more, but they don't know what. They're looking for inspiration from those who really do see its potential. Really, this is a microcosm of MS in the Ballmer era. They still have incredible engineering talent, but they have no vision.
kbatten 16y ago
Hasn't this been the same story for every windows mobile OS though? I gotta say I would be in the "gotta see it to believe it" phase if I were a mobile developer.
mahrain 16y ago
The worst thing about Microsoft is that they launch technologies / platforms without much success and then just close them up. I read that "Windows Live Spaces" is closing down, now Zune is closing shop... Imagine you invest time and energy in the Spaces network or a Zune setup, you're out of luck. Worse, there is no upgrade path.
- rahoulb 16y ago
  Nowadays, I suspect Microsoft's strategy is "throw shit at the wall and see what sticks"
rch 16y ago
I'm happy to see a thoughtful, objective post on WP7 by a generally pro-MS developer. Well done.
- astrodust 16y ago
  It's got the same flavor of sadness that an Amiga ST fan has when describing their favorite computer. I hate to say it but by the time Windows Phone 8 comes out, if it ever does, the iPhone, Android and quite possibly RIM will be way ahead. Seems like 2013 at the absolute earliest for Microsoft.

131 points by ct 16y ago

dr_ 16y ago

This is just another example of Microsoft not having their act together. I mean, forget Windows Phone 7, but Vista was just a disaster. The company nearly sacrificed it's main revenue source. Apple isn't exactly known for being transparent on matters either, but you can imagine if something goes wrong there what the internal pressure must be to get it fixed ASAP. Because soon enough they do fix it. As Steve Jobs himself said, "great artists ship" I still really feel Microsoft can get back on track if they had new executive level management. Someone younger, bolder, a little audacious but with the ability to execute - like for example bringing back Gundotra at the CEO level. It's just that they need to do it sooner rather than later.

makecheck 16y ago

Microsoft's an interesting beast. Things that "should" matter to them, like Windows, somehow reach the point of almost falling apart (see Windows Me or Vista). Then, groups that are practically losing money build great things like the Xbox 360 and Kinect. Some products that stumble end up dead, like the Zune, while others are dragged back up to par (see IE9 and Windows 7). This current mess could mean anything from "WP7 is doomed, sell your stock" to "the Eye of Sauron just hasn't shone on that product group yet". We'll see. Personally, I'm thinking WP7 will pull a Vista or two and then become a cool phone OS, but the competition isn't standing still either. When Apple was launching the iPhone, they pulled engineers from their flagship Mac OS X to work on new phone software. They seemed to think it was pretty important to launch with a strong product and have all the details right; to them, even delaying a product from another part of their business was an acceptable risk. When was the last time Microsoft did anything like that? Instead of slapping together product groups to shove their way into every has-been market, they could stand to divert some developers, developers, developers to products that need a polished launch, such as WP7.

iamdave 16y ago
That's the thing I never understood about Microsoft. When they really focus, and spend more time on producing a product versus marketing a product, the seem to do some great things (SEE: Windows 2000/NT). It seems like MS could really use from some user centric project managers or something to really get them on the course to consistent delivery, because that's what's lacking. Vista was a bust, 7 was a phenom by MS standards. The 360 did OK, the Kinect was brilliant. By the logic that is the Windows development cycle, Windows 8 is going to be an abysmal failure. I'm an OS X user now, but I'll still say how great Win7 is, and the only thing I wish to see come from the company is some form in consistency with their products and marketing. These "To the cloud" commercials NEED to stop.
- TomOfTTB 16y ago
  Without making a judgment one way or the other in regards to the people at Microsoft I'd make one point about what you said. The problem with looking at Microsoft through the lens of Windows NT to Windows 7 is that Microsoft consists of completely different people in those two eras. The people who spearheaded windows in the time of Windows NT and Windows 2000 were worth tens of millions of dollars by the time Vista went out to door. So most had long moved on to personal ventures.
  - iamdave 16y ago
    You have a very valid point, however I'm not per se making the argument of a dichotomy between Windows NT and Windows 7. I am however saying that Microsoft CAN, when they narrow down build some great products. And it seems like every time, as soon as they do, they trip up on their own two feet and fall face first on the very next one.
kenjackson 16y ago
Windows ME was a result of MS moving their top talent to the NT group. ME should have never been released, but Win2K wasn't ready to be the consumer OS. When you don't have the company riding on you, you can take bigger risks. It will be interesting to see what Windows 8 ends up becoming. Vista was largely a failure because they were overly ambitious, despite common belief. I fear that this failure will prevent Windows from being ambitious again. I hope they learned that they failed for very specific reasons -- not just ambition in of itself.

Legion 16y ago

tl;dr: Guy keeps buying shitty MS mobile products, MS dutifully keeps making shitty mobile products. Very reminiscent of Apple fans in the '90s, buying crap products because they've defined themselves to be on Team Apple.

kenjackson 16y ago
That's possibly the worst most inaccurate tldr I've seen. Did you read the article or just project what you'd like it to say. You do no one any favors by posting an inaccurate tldr.
- bostonpete 16y ago
  tl;dr: Legion's tl;dr sucked.
originalgeek 16y ago
You forgot to mention the final part: after 10 years of getting screwed by Microsoft, the guy is still hopeful that they are going to get it right.
lukifer 16y ago
To be fair: in the 90's, at least Mac fans had the excuse of not wanting to give up existing hardware/software peripherals. That's not really applicable to MS mobiles.
- dasil003 16y ago
  Not to mention the fact that Apple actually needed the rabid fanbase. Every single person could instantly hate Microsoft and they wouldn't be going anywhere for a long long long time.

jdub 16y ago

TL;DR: A very long cover letter for the guy's job application to the Microsoft Windows Phone team.

potatolicious 16y ago
And power to him - if only everyone on the WP7 team cared this much. IMO these certainly aren't the words of someone just trolling for a job.
shaggyfrog 16y ago
Job application? Does anyone willingly sign up for a death march or to preside over the funeral of a dead-end project if they can avoid it?

TomOfTTB 16y ago

I think this attitude has been the downfall of a lot of developers over the years. You fall in love with the development environment and then you transfer that love to the platform itself. The problem is sometimes great platforms aren't paired with great products. Microsoft is at least two generations behind Google and Apple at this point. Some would argue three generations. I'm a .net developer who loves C# too so I'm sympathetic. But putting a lot of resources into Windows phone 7 at this point is just folly

kenjackson 16y ago
But putting a lot of resources into Windows phone 7 at this point is just folly It feels like MS isn't putting enough skin in the game. They shipped the OS in September. Great. That gets you a toe in the door. They should have rev'ed that OS at least as many times as Apple has theirs. Apple has shipped 5 updates to iOS since September. MS -- one (the update to prepare for future updates, so really not even a real update). That's embarrassing that the market leader, with 300k apps in the appstore and 100M devices on the market is more agile. And as a developer, you have to ask yourself, "Is this a platform I want to get in bed with?" At this point, I wouldn't.
- masklinn 16y ago
  And to complete this, even if you compare W7P with the early iPhone OS (arguing that both are version ones, not that they're both living in 2011), the first 6 months Apple shipped 1 major updates, 3 bugfix updates and 1 compatibility update (for the 1st gen iPod Touch). And a second major update in month 7. 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 were all followed by 2 major and 2 bugfix updates in the first 6 months.
- architectzero 16y ago
  Comparing WP7 to iOS doesn't really make sense in this case. WP7 is, like Android, an OS used by several manufacturers and delivered on several networks. Each manufacturer and carrier has their own acceptance testing scheme. Failure at any step means tweaking and retesting. It took Android from 2008-09-23 to 2009-04-30 to get to it's first MAJOR update (cupcake, v1.5). MS is pretty much on the same pace. (Note: Android 1.1 was exclusively for the T-Mobile G-1; I don't consider that comparable to the WP7 Nodo update.) iOS runs on iPhone and iPad, and on a comparably limited number of networks. Yet it took from 2007-06-29 until 2009-06-17 (days shy of 2 years) just to get copy and paste functionality. The market leader only looks more agile today, after they worked out a ton of bugs. Considering just how well WP7 worked from day one, I think it actually has a very bright future.

peteypao 16y ago

His Microsoft-centricity is pretty annoying.

swilliams 16y ago

The marketing for Windows Phone 7 was pretty extensive in the US. I don't watch much TV, but I definitely saw plenty of the "We need a phone to save us from our phones" ads. Was it really that much smaller in the UK? And have there really been NO bugfixes or patches (other than the notorious one he mentioned)? That's insane. Microsoft has got to know how far behind the ball they are... why aren't they pulling out all the stops on this? For Microsoft: This isn't Windows. You can't wait 3 years (or more) for every release.

Strom 16y ago
I've seen lots of those "We need a phone to save us from our phones" ads and I've never in my life seen an Android or an iPhone ad. So saying that Microsoft didn't advertise seems weird.
astrodust 16y ago
All I ever see is ads for "Cloud vs. Claude" and none of them make any sense. Microsoft cloud computing for editing photos? Huh?
dagw 16y ago
I don't know about the UK, but there has been zero windows Phone 7 advertising in Sweden. No TV, no billboards, no in store promotion, hell I haven't even a working WP7 demo phone in any electronics store. If you don't follow tech blogs there would be no way to know that WP7 was even out. Compare this to Android where there is plenty of promotion on all fronts and it looks like Microsoft doesn't really want to sell phones here.

alok-g 16y ago

Is it any better with Android? Here's a list of issues: -- Android resets your phone to factory settings without asking you or even giving a warning if you port a number to it. This deserves a class-action lawsuit. See here: http://androidforums.com/droid-x-support-troubleshooting/131476-hard-reset-when-porting-new-number-x.html http://androidforums.com/droid-x-support-troubleshooting/131... -- Using the built in email application, sent emails often stuck in the outbox. See here: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=6d4b97299085cebe&hl=en http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=6d4... -- Wifi on the phone does not work if SSID is hidden. See here: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1041 http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1041 -- Bluetooth on the device is unable to connect to a desktop to transfer files or sync. See here: http://www.bing.com/search?q=android+bluetooth+paired+but+not+connected http://www.bing.com/search?q=android+bluetooth+paired+but+no... -- Once you sign in into Google Account using any Google app (like Gmail), you cannot sign out, ever! Only way to "sign out" is to reset the phone to factory defaults, which means loosing all your data and needing phone activation again. See here: http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/12/27/how-to-remove-change-google-account-from-android/ http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/12/27/how-to-remove-change-g... -- They have artificially blocked use of Google Calendar app on the phone from functioning unless using a Google Account. Of course Google isn't interested in Outlook Sync, but even third-party developers suffer. Many have started providing their own calendar apps. See here: http://www.syncdroid.net/ http://www.syncdroid.net/ If you follow the links, you may notice that many of the issues have been open for a few years, some since Android version 1.6, etc. Google just does not care. To fix the issue with sent emails stuck in the outbox, people have started from the source code of the built-in email app and created K-9 mail, which is 10X more powerful, and works.

joenathan 16y ago
Actually you are wrong on a few of those points, for one, I use bluetooth to transfer files to my phone(2.1 device) all the time, but I have seen some android phones where that does work, it seems to be dependent on whether or not the manufacturer has lock that feature down or not. Also you can remove or unlink you google account in the "Accounts & Sync" area of the settings menu.

rodh257 16y ago

I wonder what this experience is like compared to early Android adopters? Was there similar issues, with bugs and then updates not coming for them?

erikpukinskis 16y ago
Android has some pretty wacky longstanding bugs, even now. My friend and I both have HTC Incredibles, and whenever I text him I come up as his friend Frank, with Frank's picture. I got a bunch of very confused texts from him before we figured that one out. Now whenever I text him, I have to append (This is Erik).
- kenjackson 16y ago
  If you were dating a couple of girls, that could end up with some really embarrassing situations.
Apocryphon 16y ago
From the development side, the Android emulator is really wonky, which is annoying at times.

xentronium 16y ago

I am not in any position to give advice to Microsoft, but it seems to me that they are trying to apply the winning strategies they used in one game to all the others. Example: WP7. What is expected: They ship fast and they update fast and agile, they don't have giant compatibility legacy to maintain. What actually happens: WP7 took forever to ship and never got updated. My speculation why it happened: they've got some lengthy and fairly bureaucratic process of approving new features, new versions, etc. They apply the same methodic they used with windows to their WP7, like, always maintain backward compatibility, be very reliable (well, you all know what happened) and predictable. They're, like, four years late and they keep wasting time. Not to mention that WinMo wasn't too great either. I had an iPaq, which was sort of okay, but it didn't rock. It wasn't "cool" in any sense. And they probably vastly underestimate the coolness factor. My $0.02.

mattmanser 16y ago
I don't think that's their strategy generally. Their current development strategy for things like MVC and Silverlight is to pre-release new functionality as an unsupported project, full source and iterate fast. They're quite agile in areas. WP7 feels like some one has suddenly put the breaks on it.
- smiler 16y ago
  It's one thing to ship MVC & Silverlight as unsupported projects and iterate fast, but quite another to iterate phone software quickly where you could potentially brick millions of phones with one small software update. As noted in this blog post, an update applied to the phone broke it and the user had to get a brand new phone. This added a customer service burden to the mobile provider / network - which in turn means they will moan to Microsoft when they do this and give them less enthuiasm for WP7 devices in future if it keeps happening.

jister 16y ago

Was the first release of iPhone or Android really that flawless compared to WM7?

Apocryphon 16y ago
WM7 is entering the game a lot later than those two OS's, so presumably they should have learned from their mistakes by now.
rahoulb 16y ago
I bought an original iPhone because a colleague said "there's an awful lot it doesn't do but what it does do is so good you won't miss the rest". I may be miremembering but I don't recall any real issues with it, and it still is the best phone I've owned.
Andrex 16y ago
WP7 was also the seventh version of WinMo, keep in mind.

stretchwithme 16y ago

Why are you only close to giving up? Is this windows phone thing a significant platform? http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/12/07/microsoft-doesnt-expect-windows-phone-7-sales-to-catch-up-to-ios-or-android-any-time-soon/ http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/12/07/microsoft-doesnt-expe... Mossberg asked: “So.. how long before you’re back into the market… back up to a good marketshare, up there with Android and Apple?” “I don’t know..” “Couple months?” “Longer than that.” “Couple years?” “Maybe.” Isn't it time to stop developing for OS/2?

recoiledsnake 16y ago
That sounds realistic for a nascent platform. Even a super awesome OS will take time to displace the incumbents. You're disappointed that you didn't get BS marketing speak that it would defeat Apple and Google in 2 weeks or what?
- prr 16y ago
  > You're disappointed that you didn't get BS marketing speak that it would defeat Apple and Google in 2 weeks http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-windows-phone-7-rtm-with-funeral-parade-for/ http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-wind... I'll just leave that there ;)
  - recoiledsnake 16y ago
    Where's the marketing speak there? That seems to be an internal joke for the team after their hard work over 2 years for meeting the deadline of the 2010 holiday season and to "rally the troops".

yread 16y ago

I even started working on iPhone apps. I really hate Mac OSX, Objective-C, and XCode. But I had to go with the market. Stopped reading here.

inflatablenerd 16y ago
Why?
- yread 16y ago
  I don't understand why a web developer would have to go and develop applications for mobile platform when (s)he doesn't enjoy it. If I had to work with in an OS that I hate, with developer tools that I hate in a programing language that I hate I would rather change jobs.
  - rick_bc 16y ago
    But it's not a job for him; it's his business.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]

cemetric 16y ago

I'm always under the impression Microsoft is counting on luck when it comes to bringing out software. The kinect (or what's the name) is a big success, but is this because of the hardware or the software? I'm wondering too if Microsoft takes itself serious at times.

redthrowaway 16y ago
It's an interesting point. I think MS's courting of kinect hackers signifies that they haven't quite figured out what it's for yet. They know they're sitting on an awesome piece of hardware, and damned if they know what to make of it. Right now it's Wii++ and they know it could be so much more, but they don't know what. They're looking for inspiration from those who really do see its potential. Really, this is a microcosm of MS in the Ballmer era. They still have incredible engineering talent, but they have no vision.

kbatten 16y ago

Hasn't this been the same story for every windows mobile OS though? I gotta say I would be in the "gotta see it to believe it" phase if I were a mobile developer.

mahrain 16y ago

The worst thing about Microsoft is that they launch technologies / platforms without much success and then just close them up. I read that "Windows Live Spaces" is closing down, now Zune is closing shop... Imagine you invest time and energy in the Spaces network or a Zune setup, you're out of luck. Worse, there is no upgrade path.

rahoulb 16y ago
Nowadays, I suspect Microsoft's strategy is "throw shit at the wall and see what sticks"

rch 16y ago

I'm happy to see a thoughtful, objective post on WP7 by a generally pro-MS developer. Well done.

astrodust 16y ago
It's got the same flavor of sadness that an Amiga ST fan has when describing their favorite computer. I hate to say it but by the time Windows Phone 8 comes out, if it ever does, the iPhone, Android and quite possibly RIM will be way ahead. Seems like 2013 at the absolute earliest for Microsoft.