4 ms·
> This will not work. They seem to be doing fine: ~10.0M global visible accounts ~2.5M messages per day ~4.5M unbridged accounts ~500K unbridged messages p
by ijpsud 6y ago
> This will not work.
They seem to be doing fine:
~10.0M global visible accounts
~2.5M messages per day
~4.5M unbridged accounts
~500K unbridged messages per day
~2.1M rooms that Matrix.org participates in
~20,000 federated servers
~3000 msgs/s out, ~30 msgs/s in on Matrix.org
~400 projects building on Matrix
~70 companies building on Matrix
https://matrix.org/faq/ https://matrix.org/faq/
They're up to 20k visible servers from about 5.5k servers in September 2018, and if you look here: https://youtu.be/1TPICntbC5w?t=1692 https://youtu.be/1TPICntbC5w?t=1692 you can see the growth curve looks pretty good.
> Also, universal standards are not necessarily a good thing. Decentralization with multiple competing tools and standards is good
Matrix explicitly doesn't try to be "the one true standard". That's the whole idea of their bridging model: https://youtu.be/1TPICntbC5w?t=296 https://youtu.be/1TPICntbC5w?t=296
- Markoff 6y ago10M accounts with 2M rooms sounds odd, any explanation?
- detaro 6y agoWhat seems odd about that?
- Arathorn 6y ago10M (nowadays 16.8M) is the total number of matrix IDs we can see from matrix.org based on phone-home stats from Synapse. 2M (nowadays 5.18M) is the total number of matrix rooms from Synapse. The ratio is about what we'd expect - there's a mix of DMs, private rooms, and massive public rooms; the DMs will dominate, hence this ratio. Every conversation in Matrix happens in a "room" (even DMs), under the hood, which might be the point of confusion here.
- Markoff 6y agoOK, didn't know you call private conversation room