> Wikipedia frequently asserts, in its own voice, that many of Trump’s statements are “false.” Well, perhaps they are. But even if they are, it is not exactly n

> Wikipedia frequently asserts, in its own voice, that many of Trump’s statements are “false.” Well, perhaps they are. But even if they are, it is not exactly neutral for an encyclopedia article to say so Reporting the fact that someone has lied, in this case repeatedly, is neutral. And the author not liking that Wikipedia reports those facts is not evidence of Wikipedia’s bias. There are plenty of faults with the site’s moderation but this is not an example of them.