3 ms·
Ironically of course WTFPL is in fact not "do anything you want with it" despite the claims of the author and fans of the license. https://opensource.google/do
by rrdharan 6y ago
Ironically of course WTFPL is in fact not "do anything you want with it" despite the claims of the author and fans of the license.
https://opensource.google/docs/thirdparty/licenses/#wtfpl-not-allowed https://opensource.google/docs/thirdparty/licenses/#wtfpl-no...
https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/29718/is-the-wtfpl-globally-valid https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/29718/is-the-wtfpl-g...
- mokus 6y agoIt’s really quite infuriating to me that I can’t just say “yeah I made this, but anyone can have it.” I mean, really. It just seems batshit insane to me that this is problematic.
- alexhutcheson 6y agohttps://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD
- MaxBarraclough 6y agoI'd never read that Google page before. I can't make sense of the section there named The ‘restricted’ licenses. It says: > Third-party software made available under one of these licenses must not be part of Google products that are delivered to outside customers. This policy covers all 3 versions of the GPL. And yet they made Android, based on the Linux kernel.