3 ms·

That's true--her prior possible crimes or status as a sexual harasser shouldn't be relevant to the specific question of whether something improper happened. In

That's true--her prior possible crimes or status as a sexual harasser shouldn't be relevant to the specific question of whether something improper happened. In 2020, of course, it's unfortunately quite relevant in the court of public opinion. For us in the cheap seats, it's interesting data as we watch the story unfold, and wonder what actually might have happened here. Nothing we can do about it either way. It's a reminder, though, not to jump to conclusions at every headline. Most truth is never revealed, and even that that is is rarely revealed promptly.

marcusverus 6y ago
You meet Bill. Bill wants to work for you. Bill is a nice guy and is qualified to do the job. You run a background check on Bill. It turns out that Bill has a criminal history including charges of assaulting an officer and cyber-stalking an ex. Is your opinion of Bill affected in any way? Of course it is. Bill has a history of making terrible decisions. You would be remiss if you didn't question his temperament and fitness for employment. Point being, Rebecca has a history of making bad decisions. How does that not affect your take on whether on whether she is a credible accuser? This isn't a '2020' thing, it's a 'having all the data' thing.
- javagram 6y ago
  Considering the person in question hasn’t been giving detailed interviews she really can’t be described as a “credible accuser” anyway. We haven’t really gotten a description of what the accusation even might be. It would make far more sense to just get her and her supervisor on record and a copy of any emails between them before we need to jump to impugning anyone’s character because of dismissed criminal charges. Edit: here is the only other detailed communication I’ve seen so far and it really just isn’t clear what’s happening here or why she was fired. https://mobile.twitter.com/FBSaunders/status/1262867805742997504 https://mobile.twitter.com/FBSaunders/status/126286780574299...

marcusverus 6y ago

You meet Bill. Bill wants to work for you. Bill is a nice guy and is qualified to do the job. You run a background check on Bill. It turns out that Bill has a criminal history including charges of assaulting an officer and cyber-stalking an ex. Is your opinion of Bill affected in any way? Of course it is. Bill has a history of making terrible decisions. You would be remiss if you didn't question his temperament and fitness for employment. Point being, Rebecca has a history of making bad decisions. How does that not affect your take on whether on whether she is a credible accuser? This isn't a '2020' thing, it's a 'having all the data' thing.

javagram 6y ago
Considering the person in question hasn’t been giving detailed interviews she really can’t be described as a “credible accuser” anyway. We haven’t really gotten a description of what the accusation even might be. It would make far more sense to just get her and her supervisor on record and a copy of any emails between them before we need to jump to impugning anyone’s character because of dismissed criminal charges. Edit: here is the only other detailed communication I’ve seen so far and it really just isn’t clear what’s happening here or why she was fired. https://mobile.twitter.com/FBSaunders/status/1262867805742997504 https://mobile.twitter.com/FBSaunders/status/126286780574299...