3 ms·
Ooh, I know the answer to this one: zero.
by jjoonathan 6y ago
Ooh, I know the answer to this one: zero.
- ummonk 6y agoMeanwhile downthread we have this link where had the patient been slower to recover she would have been killed by organ harvesting. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hospital-errors-lead-to-dead-patient-opening-eyes-during-organ-harvesting/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hospital-errors-lead-to-dead-pa...
- crooked-v 6y agoThat has nothing to do with opt-in or opt-out, just the incompetence of a specific hospital. It's also an article from 2013.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- read_if_gay_ 6y agoIt is related to opt out because now you have to opt out to avoid this. Also not sure why you make it seem like 2013 is the middle ages or something.
- crooked-v 6y ago> now you have to opt out to avoid this There are many more things than organ removal done to dead bodies that would still kill a mistaken-as-dead person extremely dead, just slightly later in the process.
- autokad 6y agodude, people literally wake up in morgues. if there was a list of most certain things in the universe, the answer being > 0 is on that list You could argue, the number is so low the benefits outweighs the costs, but that's not your stance. Fact, its > 0.