4 ms·

F# 5 and F# tools update

• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
• 7thaccount 6y ago
  Still waiting on an F# book or tutorial which doesn't assume I already know C# backwards and forwards...that is all. Aesthetically speaking, I find F# to be absolutely gorgeous. I'm not sure why, but it just seems really clean to me. Performance is great, and I like how .NET has objects for everything that can be called out to. I gave OCaml a try, but found F# to have a much richer standard library due to .NET. It is really an uphill battle though as I'm mostly a beginner with functional programming and a .NET beginner with little C# experience. So I don't know either lingo. One day I hope to have enough time to get past the hump. I own 3 F# books. They all assume at least intermediate C# experience.
  • InnerGargoyle 6y ago
    Exactly for this reason i am steering away from F# to python. Learning F# from coming off C# is rewarding and fun but if you have no prior .net system/C# experiance, its just frustating.
  • hydroxonium 6y ago
    A good (best?) way to learn F# might be to learn some Haskell and C# first. Haskell makes sure you properly understand functional programming fundamentals. (And the syntax is very similar to F#.) You'd want to learn enough C# anyway since .NET comprises largely C# code.
    • 7thaccount 6y ago
      That cost is simply too high from a time perspective for me. So much so that I find it unlikely it ever gets the traction it needs to reach true critical mass.