4 ms·
Ah, this is a fork, NOT the original. I came across the original subspace long time ago when switching from strongSwan (IPsec based VPN) to WireGuard for my own
by terrywang 6y ago
Ah, this is a fork, NOT the original. I came across the original subspace long time ago when switching from strongSwan (IPsec based VPN) to WireGuard for my own good. There has been no development work for the original project in a while.
If you are looking for user friendly web UI for quickly building a VPN for remote access (encrypting traffic / data path between the device and Internet), with easy client management (scan the QR code for client profile thingy) try
- wg-access-server [1]
- wg-gen-web [2]
- wg-ui [3]
They all work well in a containerized fashion, all created around the same time when WireGuard was merged into Linux kernel mainline ;-)
Simple script worked better for my remote access use case for now, for use cases at scale I'd seriously take Tailscale into account (100 clients for personal - free account).
[1]: https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server https://github.com/Place1/wg-access-server
[2]: https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web
[3]: https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/wg-ui https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/wg-ui
- oregontechninja 6y agoPretty sure this is a fork because the original has arbitrary user limits due to it wanting to be a commericial product. Que hundreds of forks with the user limits removed.
- elitistphoenix 6y agoWhich one would you recommend?
- terrywang 6y agoI'd recommend wg-access-server to start with (the one web UI that I tried first), fundamentally they are pretty much the same, just UI style difference.
- BrandoElFollito 6y agoI am a happy user of the mentioned wg-gen-web (https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web https://github.com/vx3r/wg-gen-web), it helps enormously to manage WG profiles and most importantly sites only this. Specifically it written not try to manage your firewall and whatnot (how to do that is explained, though).