> They clearly coordinated to ban him This is not necessarily true, it is perfectly reasonable both that individual employee were simply like minded, or that g

> They clearly coordinated to ban him This is not necessarily true, it is perfectly reasonable both that individual employee were simply like minded, or that given the high visibility his character they all acted quickly not to be "accused" of supporting him. It surely looks like they conspired, and effectively it is as if they conspired to do it, but personally I believe that as a default it should not be accredited to a conspiracy (as in the dictionary meaning of hidden agreement) unless we have some direct evidence. Especially since the possibility that individual employees were biased and like minded is much more likely and stable.