2 ms·
And these conversions would be correct, wouldn't they? Radians are length ratios, and as such dimensionless anyway.
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
And these conversions would be correct, wouldn't they? Radians are length ratios, and as such dimensionless anyway.
- amalcon 16y agoWhile not technically required, it's pretty convenient to treat radians as their own "angle" dimension. This lets you distinguish an angular velocity from a simple periodic repetition. The latter happen to rarely (never?) occur naturally, but I run into artificial ones often enough.