4 ms·

The political argument in favor of universal basic income stresses the importance of the universal. That is, when the argument is "the others are getting cash"

The political argument in favor of universal basic income stresses the importance of the universal. That is, when the argument is "the others are getting cash", some will oppose it. But if it's "we all get cash", the opposition is less. In America, Social Security straight up gives up cash to ALL older Americans. Assuming you live long enough, you'll get Social Security. It's not immune but it remains popular. Indeed, efforts to cut back on Social Security are framed as attempts to "save" it and keep the program solvent. In contrast, food stamps, welfare, and unemployment benefits are very much on the chopping block year after year, their recipients stereotyped as "welfare queens" trying to cheat the system.

burlesona 6y ago
Technically Social Security doesn't go to all Americans. You have to work a minimum amount (and therefore pay a minimum amount in) to qualify. It's also possible to opt-out of social security, although it's not trivial to do so (IIRC you do this by claiming a conscientious objector status or something like that).
- gvjddbnvdrbv 6y ago
  Hang on is social security tied to the draft?
  - JoshTriplett 6y ago
    No, there's a religion-based opt-out for religions that object to government support. But it only applies to income from the church (such as to ministers). There are a few other narrow cases as well, such as student workers and certain government jobs.
- MattGaiser 6y ago
  At least one way is to get a religious exemption. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/020315/there-any-way-opt-out-paying-social-security.asp https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/020315/there-any-wa...
- jxramos 6y ago
  I thought I read at some point that several decades in the past there was a period when you could opt out of Social Security and put retirement in one's own hands. I always wanted to look up that history for when that forked path was allowed and when it was eliminated and why. The author of the piece I read mentioned how he earned much better returns with the money he otherwise would have had he put it into social security and was thankful he took the more "risky" route.
luckylion 6y ago
> That is, when the argument is "the others are getting cash", some will oppose it. But if it's "we all get cash", the opposition is less. But it's a sleight of hand. It's "you'll get it too (but I will take the same amount out of your pockets by increasing your taxes, ha!)", and then hoping that people will not realize it. That's quite the bet.
- frei 6y ago
  Social security is "slight of hand" too. If you make an average of just $1k/mo before retirement, your SS benefit is $900/month. But if you made 10x ($10k/mo), your SS benefit is only 3x as much [0], despite you paying 10x the taxes during your career. While this is nowhere near as progressive a tax as regular income tax, it's still a wealth transfer from high earners to low earners. 0. https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/piaformula.html https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/piaformula.html

burlesona 6y ago

Technically Social Security doesn't go to all Americans. You have to work a minimum amount (and therefore pay a minimum amount in) to qualify. It's also possible to opt-out of social security, although it's not trivial to do so (IIRC you do this by claiming a conscientious objector status or something like that).

gvjddbnvdrbv 6y ago
Hang on is social security tied to the draft?
- JoshTriplett 6y ago
  No, there's a religion-based opt-out for religions that object to government support. But it only applies to income from the church (such as to ministers). There are a few other narrow cases as well, such as student workers and certain government jobs.
MattGaiser 6y ago
At least one way is to get a religious exemption. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/020315/there-any-way-opt-out-paying-social-security.asp https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/020315/there-any-wa...
jxramos 6y ago
I thought I read at some point that several decades in the past there was a period when you could opt out of Social Security and put retirement in one's own hands. I always wanted to look up that history for when that forked path was allowed and when it was eliminated and why. The author of the piece I read mentioned how he earned much better returns with the money he otherwise would have had he put it into social security and was thankful he took the more "risky" route.

luckylion 6y ago

> That is, when the argument is "the others are getting cash", some will oppose it. But if it's "we all get cash", the opposition is less. But it's a sleight of hand. It's "you'll get it too (but I will take the same amount out of your pockets by increasing your taxes, ha!)", and then hoping that people will not realize it. That's quite the bet.

frei 6y ago
Social security is "slight of hand" too. If you make an average of just $1k/mo before retirement, your SS benefit is $900/month. But if you made 10x ($10k/mo), your SS benefit is only 3x as much [0], despite you paying 10x the taxes during your career. While this is nowhere near as progressive a tax as regular income tax, it's still a wealth transfer from high earners to low earners. 0. https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/piaformula.html https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/piaformula.html