3 ms·
When the 'micropayment' idea first came around decades ago, I got the impression that it would let us voluntarily send a little change to individuals who'd post
by 8bitsrule 6y ago
When the 'micropayment' idea first came around decades ago, I got the impression that it would let us voluntarily send a little change to individuals who'd posted something that was 'worth' looking at/hearing to us.
Had that option ever arisen, I'd have 'sent' x cents directly to the account of hundreds of creators. Because it was simple and person-to-person. Now and then, I'd have 'sent' x dollars to -someone- who'd created something of extraordinary value ... to me.
In my view, the rewards collected by brokers are usually not deserved, and the rewards for streamers highway robbery. A 'facilitator' at cost+ (limited) is a different ballgame.
The idea - simple, direct, voluntary, user-chosen 'rewards' P2P - never became a reality. I regret that. A cent, a nickel, a dime - anyone could play - from 100,000 people in a year (or even longer-tail) amounts to a very tangible reward, and valuable feedback. I don't need anyone telling me what something is worth to me; the creator does.
- shepardrtc 6y agoYou should check out Coil: https://coil.com/ https://coil.com/ They have a browser add-on that does streaming micropayments directly to creators as you view the content.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agoNo, they're a broker, just like all the others. "Direct to creators" means from your (financial institution of some type) account direct into the equivalent for the creator. No middle-men, close to zero fee, no cut, no membership.
- dannyw 6y agoFor a while in 2018, I did exactly that using Dogecoin. Creators would post their DOGE addresses. I'd chuck in $5, pay <$0.001 in TX fees, and the recipient would receive 100% of it.