5 ms·

Who? My guess is that these are "named postdocs" ("[some name] Assistant Professor", e.g. https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/jobs/14065 https://www.mathjobs.org/job

Who? My guess is that these are "named postdocs" ("[some name] Assistant Professor", e.g. https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/jobs/14065 https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/jobs/14065 or https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/jobs/15707 https://www.mathjobs.org/jobs/jobs/15707 ). Despite their names, they're limited to 3 years and only get renewed in exceptional circumstances.

mehrdadn 6y ago
I'm not going to name names here but I'm aware of at least one person whose title is a "named" Assistant Professor and one whose title is (from what I can tell online) just "Assistant Professor".
- redis_mlc 6y ago
  Generally in the US there's no career path to becoming a tenured professor. (A lot of assistant professors, etc. sleep in their cars.) You would have to have the right connections, or publish papers that were undeniably brilliant. (ie. be a celebrity.)
  - papeda 6y ago
    > Generally in the US there's no career path to becoming a tenured professor. It's true that, in general, there are far more graduating PhD students every year than tenure-track faculty positions. But I think "no career path" drastically overstates the difficulty. It's way easier than making it as a pro athlete, for example. > A lot of assistant professors, etc. sleep in their cars. Are you thinking of adjunct professors, who are not tenure-track? Assistant professors typically make at least 50k+, and in the more lucrative fields (computer science, business schools, biopharm I think) >100k is common. > You would have to have the right connections, or publish papers that were undeniably brilliant. (ie. be a celebrity.) You're correct that an average PhD student will probably not get any tenure-track faculty interviews, let alone offers. This is especially true in more resource-constrained fields like the humanities.
solveit 6y ago
John Pardon is a relatively recent example. He also became full professor at Princeton a year after graduating.
- dmix 6y ago
  I see he was also involved with Knots [1]. Can someone explain to me why this is such an active field in mathematics? I always hear about it and topology. Makes me want to read a book on it... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pardon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pardon
  - tobmlt 6y ago
    I am not qualified to attempt to explain why knots are a hot topic.. I can recommend a book on topology though. Robert Ghrist’s book: https://www.math.upenn.edu/~ghrist/notes.html https://www.math.upenn.edu/~ghrist/notes.html Do you like physics? If so maybe try John Baez’s book for more knot-centric inspiration: https://www.amazon.com/GAUGE-FIELDS-KNOTS-GRAVITY-Everything/dp/9810220340 https://www.amazon.com/GAUGE-FIELDS-KNOTS-GRAVITY-Everything...
  - solveit 6y ago
    Basically, the study of knots is the study of how the simplest 1 dimensional thing (the circle), can sit in 3-dimensional space. And it turns out that even this "simple" case is incredibly rich and difficult. So that's a reason to expect knot theory to be an inherently interesting thing to study. So topologists, and especially topologists specialising in 3-dimensional objects were always interested in knots. In the 1980s, Vaughan Jones discovered the Jones polynomial, which is a property of knots which remarkably turned out to have deep connections to all sorts of things including quantum field theory! This led to 3 decades and counting of intense study into the relationship between knots and fundamental physics. I'd like to say more, but I'm knot really qualified to speak about the connections to other fields. So that's basically the tl;dr of why so many people care about knots!
    - Natsu 6y ago
      > a property of knots which remarkably turned out to have deep connections to all sorts of things including quantum field theory Does this mean that the strings in string theory are knots?

mehrdadn 6y ago

I'm not going to name names here but I'm aware of at least one person whose title is a "named" Assistant Professor and one whose title is (from what I can tell online) just "Assistant Professor".

redis_mlc 6y ago
Generally in the US there's no career path to becoming a tenured professor. (A lot of assistant professors, etc. sleep in their cars.) You would have to have the right connections, or publish papers that were undeniably brilliant. (ie. be a celebrity.)
- papeda 6y ago
  > Generally in the US there's no career path to becoming a tenured professor. It's true that, in general, there are far more graduating PhD students every year than tenure-track faculty positions. But I think "no career path" drastically overstates the difficulty. It's way easier than making it as a pro athlete, for example. > A lot of assistant professors, etc. sleep in their cars. Are you thinking of adjunct professors, who are not tenure-track? Assistant professors typically make at least 50k+, and in the more lucrative fields (computer science, business schools, biopharm I think) >100k is common. > You would have to have the right connections, or publish papers that were undeniably brilliant. (ie. be a celebrity.) You're correct that an average PhD student will probably not get any tenure-track faculty interviews, let alone offers. This is especially true in more resource-constrained fields like the humanities.

solveit 6y ago

John Pardon is a relatively recent example. He also became full professor at Princeton a year after graduating.

dmix 6y ago
I see he was also involved with Knots [1]. Can someone explain to me why this is such an active field in mathematics? I always hear about it and topology. Makes me want to read a book on it... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pardon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pardon
- tobmlt 6y ago
  I am not qualified to attempt to explain why knots are a hot topic.. I can recommend a book on topology though. Robert Ghrist’s book: https://www.math.upenn.edu/~ghrist/notes.html https://www.math.upenn.edu/~ghrist/notes.html Do you like physics? If so maybe try John Baez’s book for more knot-centric inspiration: https://www.amazon.com/GAUGE-FIELDS-KNOTS-GRAVITY-Everything/dp/9810220340 https://www.amazon.com/GAUGE-FIELDS-KNOTS-GRAVITY-Everything...
- solveit 6y ago
  Basically, the study of knots is the study of how the simplest 1 dimensional thing (the circle), can sit in 3-dimensional space. And it turns out that even this "simple" case is incredibly rich and difficult. So that's a reason to expect knot theory to be an inherently interesting thing to study. So topologists, and especially topologists specialising in 3-dimensional objects were always interested in knots. In the 1980s, Vaughan Jones discovered the Jones polynomial, which is a property of knots which remarkably turned out to have deep connections to all sorts of things including quantum field theory! This led to 3 decades and counting of intense study into the relationship between knots and fundamental physics. I'd like to say more, but I'm knot really qualified to speak about the connections to other fields. So that's basically the tl;dr of why so many people care about knots!
  - Natsu 6y ago
    > a property of knots which remarkably turned out to have deep connections to all sorts of things including quantum field theory Does this mean that the strings in string theory are knots?