> I'm not sure why we're harping on The Times. Because '10% of a core and 200 MB of ram' just to read a few headlines is obscene, and slack being even worse do

> I'm not sure why we're harping on The Times. Because '10% of a core and 200 MB of ram' just to read a few headlines is obscene, and slack being even worse doesn't make the NYT's bloat less obscene. With my uBO/uMatrix settings, about:performance in firefox reports that the nytimes.com homepage takes 7.9 MB of ram (and immeasurably little CPU time, because I disabled javascript.) https://lite.cnn.com/en/ https://lite.cnn.com/en/ is better insofar as it takes 2.6 MB of ram.