3 ms·
> I think we owe these people who are willing to call out problems as they see it a more charitable hearing. In general, whistleblowers should be attended to,
by downerending 6y ago
> I think we owe these people who are willing to call out problems as they see it a more charitable hearing.
In general, whistleblowers should be attended to, due consideration should be given to what they are risking.
But if you're going to do it, you need to build up a case and make it carefully and dispassionately, and above all maintain your professionalism. This reads more like a divorce proceeding.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- hitekker 6y ago> But if you're going to do it, you need to build up a case and make it carefully and dispassionately, and above all maintain your professionalism. Last time I checked, the whistleblower wasn't raving or cursing on the way out. It sounds like you're just generally uncomfortable with questioning authority.
- downerending 6y agoWrong number.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- alexashka 6y agoIf you're going to be dispassionate, you'll never whistle blow - nobody weighing the pros/cons dispassionately would consider ruining their career to expose one of the millions of shit companies a worthwhile endeavour.