3 ms·
Oh I remember now. The CEO was an abused kid, who joined the KKK and stayed in it till he was about 19; then gradually left. Then 32 years passed. I am willing
by true_religion 6y ago
Oh I remember now. The CEO was an abused kid, who joined the KKK and stayed in it till he was about 19; then gradually left. Then 32 years passed.
I am willing to believe 3 decades is enough to change a man. HNs response was also tempered by the fact that many posters are young, so when this man committed his crimes they were not even born.
Throw in the fact that he is Jewish and still joined the KKK, and you can see why some decided he was a deluded or tricked child who escaped the KKK clutches rather than someone who would continue to harbor self-hate for 3 decades, acting as a sleeper agent.
This case now, is about the present day. The researcher can’t claim that any faults are merely past transgressions she has moved beyond. Nor can anyone say they don’t understand the time period this is occurring in (as the time period is now).
Edit:
In the above I reference the KKK, but the CEO was actually a neo Nazi. Same hate. Different clothing.
- iron0013 6y agoThanks for making my point—-You’re willing to swallow anything the kkk ceo claimed (including the obviously false “but I’m Jewish!” howler), but are comfortable discounting this whistleblower’s claims based on a vague sniff test and nothing more.
- Chris2048 6y agoThey didn't swallow, nor discount, anything. They pointed out reasonable doubt without committing to a conclusion, which you interpret as taking sides; which makes a different point entirely..
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]