>> With open source, it's easy to find people to do the fun, modular bits (acceleration curves, palm rejection, etc.). > If that were true, there wouldn't be c

>> With open source, it's easy to find people to do the fun, modular bits (acceleration curves, palm rejection, etc.). > If that were true, there wouldn't be crowds of people telling that palm rejection in Linux sucks balls Reading comprehension. Or intentionally selective misquoting. I'm not sure which one. I said: "Provided clean, simple, documented, pluggable APIs where people could tinker around with the fun stuff (anyone can make a new algorithm in Python and see it work in 5 minutes)" Point me to that, and I'll eat my words. My claim is that IF you provide all the plumbing and infrastructure, people will do the fun stuff. Plumbing isn't fun, though. In either case, I don't think an inability to read "qualifies [you] to tell [me] where exactly [I] can shove [my] $250 and [my] condescending ignorant attitude, and how deep [I] can shove it, too, along with the horse [I] rode in on." It qualifies you for remedial third-grade reading classes. :) I highly recommend them. I think I'm perfectly qualified to decide where to spend my own money, and it just went to DIGImend.