4 ms·
I really want to know if the telemetrics (or whatever the thing was) pushed enough packets to actually warrant the config. Setting something to the max sounds l
by ibejoeb 6y ago
I really want to know if the telemetrics (or whatever the thing was) pushed enough packets to actually warrant the config. Setting something to the max sounds like preopt to me. This must be a truly exceptional condition if it actually remained undiscovered since linux 3.
- sleepydog 6y agoI can't think of anything that would warrant a 2GB receive buffer. The buffer should be sized so that the receiving program has a reasonable amount of time to drain it before it becomes full. A large skylake VM in GCP can do 32 Gbps (lowercase b), so assuming worst conditions, a 2GB receive buffer would give the receiver 500ms to call recv(), which is a huge amount of time for something that should take microseconds, especially in the context of a client. Even if there was a specialized server that needed such a large receive buffer, it doesn't make sense to set the system-wide default so high.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]