3 ms·

By "disrupt", do you mean "improves immensely"? It depends on how much FOMO you suffer from. For instance, the folks that I used to do music jams with (picture

By "disrupt", do you mean "improves immensely"? It depends on how much FOMO you suffer from. For instance, the folks that I used to do music jams with (picture middle-aged folk playing bluegrass) have moved to FB Live(?) for some things. I don't see those, nor participate. That's okay, we do our own non-proprietary chat once a week in lieu of live jammin'. Local animal shelter posts stuff on FB, most of which I can live without. Does shit break because something, something FB SDK? Nope, at least not shit I care about, and not FB. But for the most part, I get to mostly forget that FB even exists.

swagonomixxx 6y ago
Thanks, this sounds great to me.
dmix 6y ago
Indeed. What's the point of having values if you're not willing to be burdened with some costs? Since FB lacks strong values it gets imposed on the wider community, but such is life. The only true option is using or building alternatives. Trying to chain the monster, where every individual positive attributes always has to be controlled and directed from some other central body, whom we then also have to trust with even more power, sounds like a losing game to me. Not using FB isn't that difficult anyway. There's plenty of group messaging apps that achieve much of the same.
- mikestew 6y ago
  Are you replying to me, or just hijacking to make a general point? Because FB gets blocked at DNS at my house, I could have saved you some typing on "values".
  - dmix 6y ago
    I was commenting in support of not using FB, which is supporting what you're saying...
    - mikestew 6y ago
      Gotcha, thanks for the clarification (and the stealth edit ;-). I'd delete my original question if it wouldn't leave your comment dangling.
  - type0 6y ago
    One friend of mine was visiting and noticed the same thing on my wifi. We got into debate where he argued to be freedom loving individual and I being in support of censorship. Now okay, I backed down with my "censorship" but unfortunately to quote RMS it ended up being "negative in the freedom dimension". Kinda regret it now that I was kind enough to give wifi access.

swagonomixxx 6y ago

Thanks, this sounds great to me.

dmix 6y ago

Indeed. What's the point of having values if you're not willing to be burdened with some costs? Since FB lacks strong values it gets imposed on the wider community, but such is life. The only true option is using or building alternatives. Trying to chain the monster, where every individual positive attributes always has to be controlled and directed from some other central body, whom we then also have to trust with even more power, sounds like a losing game to me. Not using FB isn't that difficult anyway. There's plenty of group messaging apps that achieve much of the same.

mikestew 6y ago
Are you replying to me, or just hijacking to make a general point? Because FB gets blocked at DNS at my house, I could have saved you some typing on "values".
- dmix 6y ago
  I was commenting in support of not using FB, which is supporting what you're saying...
  - mikestew 6y ago
    Gotcha, thanks for the clarification (and the stealth edit ;-). I'd delete my original question if it wouldn't leave your comment dangling.
- type0 6y ago
  One friend of mine was visiting and noticed the same thing on my wifi. We got into debate where he argued to be freedom loving individual and I being in support of censorship. Now okay, I backed down with my "censorship" but unfortunately to quote RMS it ended up being "negative in the freedom dimension". Kinda regret it now that I was kind enough to give wifi access.