4 ms·
For [2]--NoSQL.
by zasz 16y ago
For [2]--NoSQL.
- dexen 16y agoWell yes and no. On one hand, NoSQL as ``let's ditch relational'' is [2] squared; especially as ditching relational because of SQL is ditching the only thing good about SQL. On the other hand, if NoSQL would mean ``let's have relational language better than SQL'', they hey, that's good! It's been tried [a] even before the SQL and tried [b] since then. It's not easy for something new to get traction with all the SQL code out there. But we will arrive there some day. -- [a] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBL [b] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_manifesto http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_manifesto NB., if you attack a hot & popular topic, you better provide some argumentation, or you will be downvoted to the ground :-(