3 ms·
I really think you're missing the forest for the trees. His point was simply a big task can be broken down into smaller tasks that don't necessarily magically f
by Traster 6y ago
I really think you're missing the forest for the trees. His point was simply a big task can be broken down into smaller tasks that don't necessarily magically fit into 2 week chunks, and if you pick tasks that you know you can do within 2 weeks, often you're picking between 1-2weeks worth of work, and then the work stretches to fill the time.
It's not about how many actual endpoints there are or how you actually choose to split the tasks.