The article seems to be covering the overall response by the UK health system - which would be made up of the capabilities of the NHS and how it was guided at a

The article seems to be covering the overall response by the UK health system - which would be made up of the capabilities of the NHS and how it was guided at a strategic level by SAGE and the government. Doesn't seem contentious to me that if the NHS has had the investment it perhaps deserved over the last 10 years then this might have contributed to a less than ideal overall performance?