> Most surprising is the abysmal speed of the test[4], I’m looking forward to anyone being able to explain that part to me. Just a shot in the dark, but I thin

> Most surprising is the abysmal speed of the test[4], I’m looking forward to anyone being able to explain that part to me. Just a shot in the dark, but I think since so many tests are failing, all bets are off as to their performance. For example, I could see a test getting into a loop that normally only runs ten times and succeeds, but here gets to run a million times before the test aborts and gives up. Not sure that's what's at work here, but... tests typically have timeouts for a reason (and typically finish significantly sooner than their timeouts, for obvious reasons). :-)