4 ms·
> The sad fact of the matter is most people do not give a hoot about software being open. While that is true, occasionally people care about the consequences o
by fjh 16y ago
> The sad fact of the matter is most people do not give a hoot about software being open.
While that is true, occasionally people care about the consequences of software being open. I think that skype is an example where this is true. I personally don't have any ideological problems with using non-free software, but I do mind the fact that skype on ubuntu is an abomination UI-wise (believe me, it is far far worse than the windows and osx versions), and I have never actually managed to make a call with it. I know that at least some of my (non-geek) friends share that pain.
Unfortunately I agree that the network effect probably means that the chances of any open alternative are slim to none.
- pclark 16y agoI would dispute that open source software was easier to use for the majority of products. Agreed about Skype for Linux, mind.
- fjh 16y agoOh, that was not what I meant to say. My point was just that, because skype and its protocol are closed, Linux users are stuck with their horrible implementation. If it was open, there would at least be the possibility of a compatible, decent alternative being developed. Sorry if that wasn't clear.