4 ms·
bah e^(0.5τi)+1=0
by tybris 16y ago
bah e^(0.5τi)+1=0
- tspiteri 16y ago> bah e^(0.5τi)+1=0 nah e^(τi)=1
- tybris 16y agoWell darn, that looks even nicer.
- pixcavator 16y agoIt's not as good! You can get it from the original formula easily, but not vice versa.
- waterhouse 16y agoYou can get both formulas from this one: e^(0.25τ) = i but that doesn't make it a better formula. Or if it did, then the following formula would be infinitely superior to all of the above (and it doesn't directly mention either π or τ): e^(ix) = cos x + i*sin x
- pixcavator 16y agoYes and yes. A formula is better if it reveals more of the math behind it, in a compact form.
- Dabacon 16y agoe^(τi)-1=0. This is obviously better since it not only contains the fundamental constants e, tau, and the beautiful numbers 0 and 1, it also includes a minus sign, emphasizing the fact that we are working over a field with an additive inverse. ;)
- snes 16y agoe^(iT)=1 http://vihart.com/blog/pi-is-still-wrong/ http://vihart.com/blog/pi-is-still-wrong/