4 ms·
They are great but they are very bad for seo, so they are vastly underutilized.
by thomas 6y ago
They are great but they are very bad for seo, so they are vastly underutilized.
- lvturner 6y agoWhy are they bad for SEO? The author seemed to be talking more about CSS and JS rather than content - does not using bootstrap or ReactJS mark you down on search results?
- jachee 6y agoIMHO, SEO is just shorthand for SnakEOil. If gaming search engines is your Brad-and-butter, is your idea really that novel?
- ta17711771 6y agoIt's not about gaming them anymore. It's about structuring pages and content in such a way that Google et al believe works best for the reader. Due to Google-side analytics, it's also about bounce-rates. This leads to both more in lengthy pages with depth, as well as lengthy pages of bullshit.
- jarofgreen 6y agoI can't think of any reason why they would be. SEO things to do on your own site are all about content, markup - nothing about a tiny site is a problem here. In fact, speed of website is (was?) a important SEO factor - so by definition tiny websites start with a massive plus.
- nicbou 6y agoWhy would they be? They are extremely fast, and over 90% of the page is the main content. There is very little noise, so Google can parse them easily.