3 ms·
that was not a call to anything! It is a historical analysis. I am happy to cite my sources. Isn't assuming best intentions one of the rules here?
by dmitrygr 6y ago
that was not a call to anything! It is a historical analysis. I am happy to cite my sources.
Isn't assuming best intentions one of the rules here?
- dang 6y agoSorry for misinterpreting you. Still, please don't post generic ideological comments to HN. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20generic%20ideolog&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
- 101404 6y agoIt sounded more like an accurate historical observation. Weird comment...
- 38rurhrjd 6y agoI agree, if the bar for reading comprehension includes an inability to distinguish a truism from a statement of fact.
- dang 6y agoMaybe so, but that isn't enough. It also needs not to be trite and shallow. Note this guideline: "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html There's tons of previous explanation if you skip over the trivial bits in https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20generic%20ideolog&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que.... Also https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=by%3Adang%20generic%20discussion&sort=byDate&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... more generically.