11 ms·

I think it's. Usually, compiler generates each concrete implementation for generic. But in go, that's programmer's job. Maybe it's trade off for language's simp

by bagol 6y ago

I think it's. Usually, compiler generates each concrete implementation for generic. But in go, that's programmer's job. Maybe it's trade off for language's simplicity.

erik_seaberg 6y ago
This is an opportunity to use a higher-level DRY language to drive the code generator, and treat Go like assembly.