4 ms·
This would be an incredible public service. While I believe Google is within its right to censor information on their platforms, the opacity with-which they do
by crocodiletears 6y ago
This would be an incredible public service. While I believe Google is within its right to censor information on their platforms, the opacity with-which they do it is imo unacceptable, given the scale of their influence on the public dialogue. Similarly, I think any media conglomerate should be required to publish any formal lists of in-house gag-orders.
- TechBro8615 6y agoIronically, it was google that first innovated along these lines with their “chilling effects” project. Any time a URL was removed via a copyright complaint, they would log it. If a search result was censored, you could see the copyright complaint. I’m not sure if they still do this.
- rnotaro 6y agoYes it does! They send the Chilling Effect report by email now though so you need to drop your email to received the list of DMCA'ed URIs.