4 ms·
> "...charges of criminal damage to property and reckless discharge of a weapon within city limits." ...doesn't seem like we need specific laws here for drones
by koheripbal 6y ago
> "...charges of criminal damage to property and reckless discharge of a weapon within city limits."
...doesn't seem like we need specific laws here for drones. Shooting someone's property with a deadly weapon will break serious laws in almost all jurisdictions.
- clairity 6y agoit's pretty provocative on both sides. on one hand, flying camera scouting out private property and individuals. on the other, shooting and destroying private property. whose property (and privacy) rights should win? uncovering illegal activity is generally a societal good, but invasion of privacy is not. protecting privacy (and property) rights are a general societal good, but destroying others' property is not.
- colejohnson66 6y ago> whose property (and privacy) rights should win? I’m of the opinion that they both violated each other’s rights and both should be punished.