3 ms·

A selling point in comparison to what? A "one evening project" installation doesn't seem to be all that amazing by any standard, in my opinion.

greggyb 6y ago
I think that the parent is saying that "trying OpenBSD" is a "one evening project". The installation should be complete within just a couple minutes.
- int_19h 6y ago
  I don't see how one could try OpenBSD, and derive any conclusions other than, "oh great, yet another Unix", in a single evening.
  - hedora 6y ago
    To get it working at all, you have to find the manual. Once you find the manual, you’ll realize it’s well-documented and simple, and that simply using it has great educational value. If those things don’t appeal to you, it’s probably not the OS for you. It takes about an evening to figure this out, in my experience.
    - hackmiester 6y ago
      But those things apply to Linux distributions too, e.g., Debian.
      - wilsonthewhale 6y ago
        Having experienced both operating systems, Debian gets nowhere close. The Debian wiki is full of outdated articles. OpenBSD's manual pages and online FAQ combined have never failed to answer a question I've had about the base system. It's really that good. The ArchWiki is close behind in usefulness, but that's maintained by its community and article quality varies.
        blaser-waffle 6y ago
        The Arch wiki is great. Reminds me of the old Gentoo wiki from way back when Gentoo was the new hotness. I'm not even an Arch user but documentation as to how things like Window Managers work is fantastic.
  - yuribro 6y ago
    In my experience, the first step in trying out a new system is installing it, configuring everything (from network connectivity to various peripherals), installing your favorite software and so on. This gives a good idea on how to work with the system, how good the documentation is (as another poster already mentioned), how simple and consistent everything is. Installing in a VM is not the best differentiation, since in many OSs these experience was streamlined and everything usually works out of the box, but the customization part is still a good example. Of course in the end, you might get to a setup similar to other OSs - running a browser in a windows manager and a buch of other common tools (IDEs, editors, productivity apps), but the way you get there, and the amount of problems you encounter along the way is a major part of using an OS. I think you can get a good impression in a few hours, and see how it's different. (For example, I had a similar experience with NixOS: In a few hours you see how radically different it is and learn how it fits you)

greggyb 6y ago

I think that the parent is saying that "trying OpenBSD" is a "one evening project". The installation should be complete within just a couple minutes.

int_19h 6y ago
I don't see how one could try OpenBSD, and derive any conclusions other than, "oh great, yet another Unix", in a single evening.
- hedora 6y ago
  To get it working at all, you have to find the manual. Once you find the manual, you’ll realize it’s well-documented and simple, and that simply using it has great educational value. If those things don’t appeal to you, it’s probably not the OS for you. It takes about an evening to figure this out, in my experience.
  - hackmiester 6y ago
    But those things apply to Linux distributions too, e.g., Debian.
    - wilsonthewhale 6y ago
      Having experienced both operating systems, Debian gets nowhere close. The Debian wiki is full of outdated articles. OpenBSD's manual pages and online FAQ combined have never failed to answer a question I've had about the base system. It's really that good. The ArchWiki is close behind in usefulness, but that's maintained by its community and article quality varies.
      - blaser-waffle 6y ago
        The Arch wiki is great. Reminds me of the old Gentoo wiki from way back when Gentoo was the new hotness. I'm not even an Arch user but documentation as to how things like Window Managers work is fantastic.
- yuribro 6y ago
  In my experience, the first step in trying out a new system is installing it, configuring everything (from network connectivity to various peripherals), installing your favorite software and so on. This gives a good idea on how to work with the system, how good the documentation is (as another poster already mentioned), how simple and consistent everything is. Installing in a VM is not the best differentiation, since in many OSs these experience was streamlined and everything usually works out of the box, but the customization part is still a good example. Of course in the end, you might get to a setup similar to other OSs - running a browser in a windows manager and a buch of other common tools (IDEs, editors, productivity apps), but the way you get there, and the amount of problems you encounter along the way is a major part of using an OS. I think you can get a good impression in a few hours, and see how it's different. (For example, I had a similar experience with NixOS: In a few hours you see how radically different it is and learn how it fits you)