3 ms·
It is not just monopolistic control of their specific areas of interest. They have had pretty tight integration with the State Department, especially under the
by rdtsc 6y ago
It is not just monopolistic control of their specific areas of interest. They have had pretty tight integration with the State Department, especially under the previous administration, getting involved in negotiations and all kinds of affairs: https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems
(quote from there):
> Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot do . . . [Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov’t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shit-bag.14
- pmorais 6y agoWikileaks? Really? This isn’t /r/conspiracy. Find a better source.
- dylan604 6y agoAre you saying the document quoted is not real? Sure, the scruples of the site may not be in alignment with yours, but if the data is valid...
- NathanKP 6y agoWikileaks has a rather infamous history of overstating the significance and meaning of the leaks they publish in ways that is straight up misinformation, or borderline misinformation. I'd take anything they say with a serious grain of salt.
- rdtsc 6y agoWhat is a better source? Can you show some examples?