3 ms·
Most scientific software developers have been developing and working with enormously complex codebases for years. I've spent many years of my career working on
by Silhouette 6y ago
Most scientific software developers have been developing and working with enormously complex codebases for years.
I've spent many years of my career working on highly technical software. I've worked in offices full of professional programmers where many also had postgraduate qualifications in STEM subjects. Those teams did indeed work on quite complex codebases for years.
Do you know what else they typically had? Testing infrastructure that was ahead of its time, careful validation of the mathematics being used before it was implemented, a reasonably clean and systematic software design, and good traceability from the mathematical code back to the underlying mathematics.
This is not rocket science. This is not even unusual if you work in this field. It's just what happens when you let professionals with an appropriate skill set do the job: programmers with technical backgrounds implement models constructed by subject matter experts.
Having one set of skills without the other is not a recipe for success.
- matthewdgreen 6y agoThen you and your team should take over the epidemic modeling software development, there's a real need. I assume you can deliver on an academic budget and produce high-quality code in time for it to be useful in this pandemic? Because if you cannot do those things, you're not really contributing anything of any quality.
- Silhouette 6y agoThe total cost of the pandemic to this country could plausibly be approaching the trillions of pounds scale by the time we're through the worst of it. I think the government could have sprung for a few software developers who knew what they were doing back at the start of the year. Apparently they'd already had plenty of time to establish a relatively large group of privileged expert advisors, including some who worked on these kinds of models. Perhaps if they'd been more open about that process, the gap in their capabilities could have been pointed out soon enough to do something useful about it. You write as if you think what I'm describing is somehow unusual. It is not. I have probably worked with at least 30-40 well-qualified people just in my own career from whom any well-mixed team of say 3-5 developers could have done what we're talking about here within a relevant time frame. We are not talking about rocket science, just good software development practices being employed by experienced programmers with technical backgrounds who are used to implementing the models of subject matter experts. This isn't some magical unicorn skill set.