> He says that once the reactor is flooded with water they won't have to do any more pressure releases. Again, I don't see how that follows. He's just not stat

> He says that once the reactor is flooded with water they won't have to do any more pressure releases. Again, I don't see how that follows. He's just not stating the (true) premise that the seawater will be able to absorb the heat; he's implying it and relying on it. That doesn't make the article illogical, it makes it mildly enthymematic.