"Women’s representation is important because women tend to offer viewpoints and perspectives that are different from men’s, and these underrepresented perspecti

"Women’s representation is important because women tend to offer viewpoints and perspectives that are different from men’s, and these underrepresented perspectives are critical in addressing cyber risks." cite please? Anecdotally, I know plenty of women in cyber security -- it's the field I have one of my degrees in and I work in at times, and I see no specific, quantifiable difference in their "viewpoints and perspectives" from men's "viewpoints and perspectives" in this field. I'm an advocate for women in STEM, I want to see women represented wherever they want to be represented -- but articles like this are just bullshit fluff, and the person who wrote it has no expertise in the field to support his article anyway. He's a professor of "management" who writes blockchain articles.