4 ms·
Well, yes, but also that Strava takes this hands-off approach like they're not responsible for the data they collate
by notkaiho 6y ago
Well, yes, but also that Strava takes this hands-off approach like they're not responsible for the data they collate
- nelaboras 6y agoWhat should strava do? Ask each country in the world which areas they want censored?(nuclear power plants, parliament buildings, boarding schools for rich kids, ...?)
- toyg 6y agoPretty sure that’s how it will end up being, eventually, in the same way GoogleMaps had to buckle. I can see the smartest countries providing a standard webservice: you-private-company-using-geolocation will have to query a certain area, and get back a shape that you must blur or otherwise suppress. Access to the service should be heavily logged / throttled to avoid mass-scanning, and obviously “customers” will be vetted and forced to sign onerous NDAs. You don’t like the service constraints? Tough shit, here is a law that says use it or be fucked.
- nxpnsv 6y agoHow about a "dont record where you shouldn't" clause in TOS... probably there already is one...
- notkaiho 6y agoOr, you know, they could not make it public by default :)