3 ms·
The quote you quoted literally does not exist in any source. In other words, you made it up, and put quote marks around it. That's not a super great way of con
by natch 6y ago
The quote you quoted literally does not exist in any source.
In other words, you made it up, and put quote marks around it. That's not a super great way of conducting a conversation. OK.
Even so, I think the state should have the power to make that determination, if it's being asked to hand you a check.
But they consider factors like family risk and childcare needs, and they have interviews to go over details of specific cases.
So I think you're too easily making up stuff here and not grasping what the real facts are.
- pmiller2 6y agoYes, those are words I used earlier that the person I was replying to ignored. I did so openly and without attributing them to anyone else. What's the problem? Glad to know you think the state has a right to make my job 3x as dangerous, because "fuck me," right? Circumstances aside, you're literally saying the state has a right to send some people into the line of fire for the sake of what? Capitalism? The economy?
- natch 6y agoYou can choose whether to work or not. There are other options. The state isn't sending you into a line of fire or anywhere for that matter. And the state didn't make your job 3x more dangerous; the virus might have done that, possibly, depending on the job. Lots of things make life more dangerous. Some of those things are not controllable even by governments or employers. I guess I'm feeding a troll here though, sigh.
- AmericanChopper 6y agoPlease don’t forget that the suggestion that these jobs “3x more dangerous”, or that by returning to work you’re subjecting yourself to a 1% chance of death from COVID-19, are just complete fabrications invented by pmiller2. So far he is yet to voice a single concern about the actual conditions of people currently returning to work in CA, or any reason at all why it might be unsafe for them to do so.